Skip to content

gh-128341: Simplify the definition of _Py_INTERNAL_ABI_SLOT and use it in stdlib modules#145770

Open
befeleme wants to merge 2 commits intopython:mainfrom
befeleme:internal-abi-slot
Open

gh-128341: Simplify the definition of _Py_INTERNAL_ABI_SLOT and use it in stdlib modules#145770
befeleme wants to merge 2 commits intopython:mainfrom
befeleme:internal-abi-slot

Conversation

@befeleme
Copy link
Contributor

@befeleme befeleme commented Mar 10, 2026

Please consider discussing this in the issue linked, rather than it the PR, since this would ping a huge list of reviewers.

_PyABIInfo_DEFAULT is available in Include/modsupport.h, there's not need
to duplicate the definition here.

Rename from _Py_INTERNAL_ABI_SLOT, as it's no longer internal.
This enables running a check of ABI version compatibility.

_tkinter, _tracemalloc and readline don't use the slots, hence they need
explicit handling.
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood removed their request for review March 10, 2026 16:49
}

static struct PyModuleDef_Slot module_slots[] = {
_Py_ABI_SLOT,
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 Mar 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

_asyncio is a builtin module as it is statically linked, this check is not needed as it is not a shared library module.

@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Mar 10, 2026

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

@brettcannon brettcannon removed their request for review March 10, 2026 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants