-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.2k
gh-145492: Fix defaultdict __repr__ infinite recursion #145659
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
encukou
merged 5 commits into
python:main
from
mvanhorn:osc/145492-fix-defaultdict-repr-recursion
Mar 10, 2026
+21
−2
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cbcaae0
gh-145492: Fix defaultdict __repr__ infinite recursion
mvanhorn 5ab2070
Add NEWS entry for defaultdict __repr__ recursion fix
mvanhorn eefe96e
Credit KowalskiThomas for bug analysis in NEWS entry
mvanhorn c4dfad8
📰🤖 Added by blurb_it.
mvanhorn 0feb120
fix(news): use :gh: instead of :issue: and remove duplicate blurb
mvanhorn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions
3
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2026-03-09-00-00-00.gh-issue-145492.457Afc.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
| Fix infinite recursion in :class:`collections.defaultdict` ``__repr__`` | ||
| when a ``defaultdict`` contains itself. Based on analysis by KowalskiThomas | ||
| in :gh:`145492`. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hope I am not too late, but this test never triggers an infinite recursion in python 3.14 without the fix.
I suggest replacing this line with
return f"ProblematicFactory for {repr(dd)}"as reported in the @KowalskiThomas issue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oof. Thanks for the catch! I though I tested, but apparently I used the wrong code :/
@mvanhorn, why did you change this part of the reproducer?
@KowalskiThomas, now I regret not asking you to send your branch as a PR. Sorry! :(
If you want to get it over the finish line (alas, without the start), now's your chance. Or I can send a fix-up PR myself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch by @YvesDup - I didn't realize I was weakening the reproducer. I've submitted a fix-up PR at #145761 that uses
return f"ProblematicFactory for {repr(dd)}"to match the original reproducer. Happy to close it if @KowalskiThomas wants to pick it up instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can do it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, go ahead @KowalskiThomas
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created #145788 which should fix the regression test to properly fail!