Update Rust crate lcov to v0.8.2

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
lcov	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.8.1 -> 0.8.2

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

gifnksm/lcov (lcov)

v0.8.2

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 0:45am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 0:45am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 0:45am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 0:45am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk lockfile-only dependency bump; primary impact is build/dependency resolution via updated lcov and its transitive crates (thiserror, syn).

Overview
Updates Rust dependency lockfile to lcov 0.8.2 (from 0.8.1), pulling in updated transitive requirements (notably thiserror 2.0.18 for lcov).

Also adjusts resolved versions in Cargo.lock for data-encoding-macro-internal to use syn 1.0.109 instead of 2.x.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit d035578. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust crate lcov from v0.8.1 to v0.8.2 (Renovate patch bump).
Changes: Refreshes Cargo.lock accordingly; no application/source code changes are included.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (618964d) to head (d035578).
⚠️ Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8585      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.60%   62.49%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files        1317     1318       +1     
  Lines      133975   134209     +234     
  Branches     5517     5517              
==========================================
  Hits        83877    83877              
- Misses      49183    49417     +234     
  Partials      915      915              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.39% <ø> (-0.34%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (-0.13%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/lcov-0.x-lockfile (d035578) with main (2b84e96)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.579 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.951 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.449 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.842 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$68.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.446 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$55.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$256 \mathrm{ms} \pm 800 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-40.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 709 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$99.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 513 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$297 \mathrm{ms} \pm 782 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.784 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$33.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$36.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.606 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.973 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$409 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.24 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$455 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.36 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$417 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.48 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$422 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.71 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$429 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.30 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$432 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.48 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$294 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.03 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$323 \mathrm{ms} \pm 761 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$302 \mathrm{ms} \pm 935 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$309 \mathrm{ms} \pm 843 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$308 \mathrm{ms} \pm 694 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$313 \mathrm{ms} \pm 767 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.288 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 610 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 658 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$540 \mathrm{ms} \pm 802 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.963 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph