Update `vitest` npm packages by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8568 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-03-24T00:42:29Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
@effect/vitest (source)	`0.27.0` -> `0.29.0`
vitest (source)	`4.1.0` -> `4.1.1`
vitest-browser-react	`2.0.5` -> `2.1.0`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

Effect-TS/effect (@effect/vitest)

`v0.29.0`

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Updated dependencies [f7bb09b, bd7552a, ad1a7eb, 0d32048, 0d32048]:
- effect@3.21.0

`v0.28.0`

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Updated dependencies [fc82e81, 82996bc, 4d97a61, f6b0960, 8798a84]:
- effect@3.20.0

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

`v4.1.1`

Compare Source

🚀 Features

experimental:
- Expose matchesTags to test if the current filter matches tags - by @sheremet-va in #9913 (eec53)
- Introduce experimental.vcsProvider - by @sheremet-va in #9928 (56115)

🐞 Bug Fixes

Mark TestProject.testFilesList internal properly - by @sapphi-red in #9867 (54f26)
Detect fixture that returns without calling use - by @oilater in #9831 and #9861 (633ae)
Drop vite 8.beta support - by @AriPerkkio in #9862 (b78f5)
Type regression in vi.mocked() static class methods - by @purepear and @hi-ogawa in #9857 (90926)
Properly re-evaluate actual modules of mocked external - by @hi-ogawa in #9898 (ae5ec)
Preserve coverage report when html reporter overlaps - by @hi-ogawa in #9889 (2d81a)
Provide vi.advanceTimers to the preview provider - by @sheremet-va in #9891 (1bc3e)
Don't leak event listener in playwright provider - by @sheremet-va in #9910 (d9355)
Open browser in --standalone mode without running tests - by @sheremet-va in #9911 (e78ad)
Guard disposable and optional body - by @sheremet-va in #9912 (6fdb2)
Resolve retry.condition RegExp serialization issue - by @nstepien and @hi-ogawa in #9942 (7b605)
collect:
- Don't treat extra props on test return as tests - by @sheremet-va in #9871 (141e7)
coverage:
- Simplify provider types - by @AriPerkkio in #9931 (aaf9f)
- Load built-in provider without module runner - by @AriPerkkio in #9939 (bf892)
expect:
- Soft assertions continue after .resolves/.rejects promise errors - by @mixelburg, Maks Pikov, Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) and @hi-ogawa in #9843 (6d74b)
- Fix sinon-chai style API - by @hi-ogawa in #9943 (0f08d)
pretty-format:
- Limit output for large object - by @hi-ogawa and Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) in #9949 (0d5f9)

View changes on GitHub

vitest-community/vitest-browser-react (vitest-browser-react)

`v2.1.0`

Compare Source

🚀 Features

Integrate trace mark with render - by @hi-ogawa and Claude Opus 4.6 in #47 (2b983)

🐞 Bug Fixes

Update links to api documentation - by @nilshartmann in #48 (91885)

View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-03-24T00:42:34Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 3:55pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 3:55pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 3:55pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 26, 2026 3:55pm

cursor · 2026-03-24T00:42:39Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Mostly dependency bumps, but updates test tooling (vitest/@effect/vitest) and related transitive packages, which could change test/runtime behavior or introduce peer-dependency incompatibilities.

Overview
Updates test-related dependencies: bumps vitest in @hashintel/petrinaut from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1, and bumps @effect/vitest in @local/harpc-client from 0.27.0 to 0.29.0.

Refreshes yarn.lock accordingly, pulling in newer vitest subpackages and other transitive updates (notably newer vite/rolldown resolutions required by updated toolchain packages).

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit c47b657. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

cursor · 2026-03-24T00:43:41Z

libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript/package.json

    "@effect/rpc": "0.71.1",
    "@effect/sql": "0.46.0",
-    "@effect/vitest": "0.27.0",
+    "@effect/vitest": "0.29.0",


Peer dependency mismatch: effect 3.20.0 vs required ^3.21.0

High Severity

@effect/vitest was bumped to 0.29.0, which requires effect: ^3.21.0 as a peer dependency. However, this package still pins effect at 3.20.0 in its dependencies. This unsatisfied peer dependency can cause runtime errors or unexpected behavior in tests if the new @effect/vitest version relies on APIs or behaviors introduced in effect@3.21.0.

Additional Locations (1)

yarn.lock#L5729-L5730

augmentcode · 2026-03-24T00:43:59Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Harpc TypeScript client’s dev dependency on @effect/vitest from 0.27.0 to 0.29.0.
Why: Keeps the Effect/Vitest integration current with upstream patch releases (lockfile updated accordingly).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

augmentcode · 2026-03-24T00:44:00Z

libs/@local/harpc/client/typescript/package.json

    "@effect/rpc": "0.71.1",
    "@effect/sql": "0.46.0",
-    "@effect/vitest": "0.27.0",
+    "@effect/vitest": "0.29.0",


@effect/vitest@0.29.0 appears to pull in effect@3.21.x; since this package pins effect to 3.20.0, please double-check the install doesn’t end up with two effect versions (which can cause subtle test/runtime/type mismatches).

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

codspeed-hq · 2026-03-26T15:46:00Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/js/vitest-npm-packages (c47b657) with main (82b4650)}

github-actions · 2026-03-26T17:00:23Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.714 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.523 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.123 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.447 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$46.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$49.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$53.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$48.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$428 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 589 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$95.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 466 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$295 \mathrm{ms} \pm 679 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$94.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 466 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 459 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 490 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 509 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 491 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$144 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$574 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.83 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge March 24, 2026 00:42

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Mar 24, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 24, 2026 00:43 View deployment

cursor bot reviewed Mar 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

augmentcode bot reviewed Mar 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 24, 2026 00:44 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 24, 2026 00:53 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested a review from a team March 24, 2026 01:05

Update vitest npm packages

c47b657

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/vitest-npm-packages branch from cdba91e to c47b657 Compare March 26, 2026 15:40

github-actions bot added the type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team label Mar 26, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 26, 2026 15:43 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 26, 2026 15:43 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 26, 2026 15:44 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 26, 2026 15:55 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested a review from a team March 26, 2026 16:05

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Mar 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v0.29.0

Patch Changes

v0.28.0

Patch Changes

v4.1.1

🚀 Features

🐞 Bug Fixes

View changes on GitHub

v2.1.0

🚀 Features

🐞 Bug Fixes

View changes on GitHub

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor bot Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Peer dependency mismatch: effect 3.20.0 vs required ^3.21.0

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

hash-worker bot commented Mar 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v0.29.0`

`v0.28.0`

`v4.1.1`

`v2.1.0`

vercel bot commented Mar 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Mar 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading