Skip to content

feat(create-cli): add monorepo setup mode#1265

Merged
hanna-skryl merged 7 commits intomainfrom
monorepo-support-step
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

feat(create-cli): add monorepo setup mode#1265
hanna-skryl merged 7 commits intomainfrom
monorepo-support-step

Conversation

@hanna-skryl
Copy link
Collaborator

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl commented Mar 6, 2026

Closes #1245

Support for monorepos has been added to the create-cli setup wizard. Using shared monorepo utilities, the wizard now automatically detects monorepo tools and offers a choice between standalone and monorepo setup modes. In monorepo mode, the wizard creates a shared preset with a createConfig factory function, per-project config files that import this preset, and a code-pushup command (using Nx target or package.json script) for each project it finds. The type system supports a plugin scope field for future use, allowing plugins to target either the shared preset or the root config.

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl self-assigned this Mar 6, 2026
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 27959e0

Command Status Duration Result
nx run ci:code-pushup -- merge-diffs --files=/h... ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa... ✅ Succeeded 1m 34s View ↗
nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa... ✅ Succeeded 13m 53s View ↗
nx run-many -t unit-test,int-test ✅ Succeeded 14s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-03-10 13:04:43 UTC

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl changed the title Monorepo support step feat(create-cli): add monorepo setup mode Mar 6, 2026
@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl force-pushed the monorepo-support-step branch from a12767d to 48fb8a1 Compare March 6, 2026 22:43
@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1265

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1265

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1265

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1265

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1265

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/axe-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/axe-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1265

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1265

commit: 27959e0

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl force-pushed the monorepo-support-step branch from 48fb8a1 to 08a8e02 Compare March 6, 2026 22:53
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit 669d3bc with previous commit bbf49e8.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Performance 🔴 36 🔴 34 ↓ −1.9
Code coverage 🟢 93 🟢 92 ↓ −0.3
Documentation 🟡 52 🟡 52 ↓ −0.1
Bug prevention 🟡 75 🟡 75 ↓ −0.1
Axe Accessibility 🟡 88 🟡 88 ↓ −0.1
Code style 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
Security 🔴 0 🔴 0 –
Updates 🟡 73 🟡 73 –
Type Safety 🟡 67 🟡 67 –
Miscellaneous 🟡 67 🟡 67 –
Accessibility 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
Best Practices 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
SEO 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
👎 3 groups regressed, 👍 1 audit improved, 👎 8 audits regressed, 17 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Lighthouse Performance 🔴 36 🔴 34 ↓ −1.9
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 93 🟢 92 ↓ −0.3
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🟡 52 🟡 52 ↓ −0.1

31 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Lighthouse Speed Index 🟨 5.6 s 🟥 6.4 s ↑ +14.1 %
Lighthouse First Contentful Paint 🟥 3.1 s 🟥 3.2 s ↑ +4.3 %
JSDocs coverage Types coverage 🟥 277 undocumented types 🟥 277 undocumented types +0 %
Lighthouse Total Blocking Time 🟥 2,470 ms 🟥 2,950 ms ↑ +19.7 %
Lighthouse Max Potential First Input Delay 🟥 660 ms 🟥 770 ms ↑ +16.4 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 598 undocumented functions 🟥 618 undocumented functions ↑ +3.3 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 94.6 % 🟩 94.1 % ↓ −0.5 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 92.8 % 🟩 92.6 % ↓ −0.2 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 279 undocumented variables 🟥 282 undocumented variables ↑ +1.1 %
Lighthouse Avoids enormous network payloads 🟩 Total size was 2,386 KiB 🟩 Total size was 2,378 KiB ↓ −0.3 %
Lighthouse Minimizes main-thread work 🟥 10.5 s 🟥 11.5 s ↑ +10 %
Lighthouse JavaScript execution time 🟥 3.3 s 🟥 4.4 s ↑ +31.2 %
Lighthouse Largest Contentful Paint 🟥 13.3 s 🟥 12.5 s ↓ −6 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused JavaScript 🟥 Potential savings of 343 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 342 KiB ↓ −31.1 %
Lighthouse Uses efficient cache policy on static assets 🟨 31 resources found 🟨 31 resources found ↑ +0.1 %
Lighthouse Server Backend Latencies 🟩 1,370 ms 🟩 1,110 ms ↓ −19.4 %
Lighthouse Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 🟥 Potential savings of 86 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 101 KiB ↓ −33.3 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused CSS 🟥 Potential savings of 111 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 80 KiB ↓ −21.7 %
Lighthouse Initial server response time was short 🟩 Root document took 560 ms 🟩 Root document took 480 ms ↓ −14.5 %
Lighthouse Metrics 🟩 100% 🟩 100% ↓ −0.4 %
Lighthouse Time to Interactive 🟥 14.2 s 🟥 14.1 s ↓ −0.3 %
Lighthouse Network Round Trip Times 🟩 20 ms 🟩 10 ms ↓ −40.2 %
TypeScript Semantic errors 🟥 37 errors 🟥 34 errors ↓ −8.1 %
JS packages Vulnerabilities for npm dev dependencies. 🟥 61 vulnerabilities (3 critical, 39 high, 12 moderate, 7 low) 🟥 62 vulnerabilities (3 critical, 40 high, 12 moderate, 7 low) ↑ +1.6 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 89.2 % 🟨 89.2 % ↑ +0.1 %
Lighthouse Cumulative Layout Shift 🟩 0 🟩 0.001 ↑ +358.7 %

652 other audits are unchanged.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit 669d3bc with previous commit bbf49e8.

💼 Project create-cli

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 98 🟢 91 ↓ −7.4
Documentation 🔴 24 🔴 24 ↓ −0.1

4 other categories are unchanged.

👎 2 groups regressed, 👍 1 audit improved, 👎 4 audits regressed, 1 audit changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 98 🟢 91 ↓ −7.4
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🔴 24 🔴 24 ↓ −0.1

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
JSDocs coverage Types coverage 🟥 13 undocumented types 🟥 13 undocumented types +0 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 20 undocumented functions 🟥 39 undocumented functions ↑ +95 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 100 % 🟨 89.5 % ↓ −10.5 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 99.2 % 🟩 93.8 % ↓ −5.5 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 94 % 🟩 92.2 % ↓ −1.9 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 10 undocumented variables 🟥 13 undocumented variables ↑ +30 %

437 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project utils

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Documentation 🟡 61 🟡 61 ↓ −0.3
Code coverage 🟢 95 🟢 95 ↓ −0.1

4 other categories are unchanged.

👎 2 groups regressed, 👍 1 audit improved, 👎 5 audits regressed

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🟡 61 🟡 61 ↓ −0.3
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 95 🟢 95 ↓ −0.1

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 50 undocumented variables 🟥 52 undocumented variables ↑ +4 %
JSDocs coverage Types coverage 🟨 56 undocumented types 🟥 58 undocumented types ↑ +3.6 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 242 undocumented functions 🟥 252 undocumented functions ↑ +4.1 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 95.9 % 🟩 95.6 % ↓ −0.3 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 91.2 % 🟩 91.4 % ↑ +0.1 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 97.8 % 🟩 97.7 % ↓ −0.1 %

438 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project ci

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Documentation 🟡 68 🟡 68 ↑ +0.3
Code coverage 🟢 92 🟢 92 ↓ −0.1

4 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved, 👎 1 group regressed, 👍 3 audits improved, 👎 2 audits regressed, 1 audit changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🟡 68 🟡 68 ↑ +0.3
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 92 🟢 92 ↓ −0.1

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
JSDocs coverage Types coverage 🟥 26 undocumented types 🟥 24 undocumented types ↓ −7.7 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 94.8 % 🟩 93.6 % ↓ −1.3 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 91 undocumented functions 🟥 82 undocumented functions ↓ −9.9 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 83.5 % 🟨 82.8 % ↓ −0.8 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 96.6 % 🟩 97.1 % ↑ +0.5 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 16 undocumented variables 🟥 14 undocumented variables ↓ −12.5 %

439 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project plugin-lighthouse

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

All of 6 categories are unchanged.

1 audit changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

All of 15 groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 98.8 % 🟩 98.8 % ↓ −0.1 %

443 other audits are unchanged.

10 other projects are unchanged.

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2026 23:12
@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl requested a review from matejchalk March 6, 2026 23:12
matejchalk
matejchalk reviewed Mar 9, 2026
View reviewed changes
@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl force-pushed the monorepo-support-step branch from 4ea61b2 to ea2f978 Compare March 9, 2026 20:18
@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl requested a review from matejchalk March 9, 2026 20:28
matejchalk
matejchalk requested changes Mar 10, 2026
View reviewed changes
@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl merged commit f02b9de into main Mar 10, 2026
24 checks passed
@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl deleted the monorepo-support-step branch March 10, 2026 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@matejchalk matejchalk matejchalk approved these changes

Assignees

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl

Labels

🧩 ci 🧩 create-cli 🔬 testing writing tests 🛠️ tooling 🧩 utils

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Monorepo support in setup wizard

2 participants

@hanna-skryl @matejchalk